Please submit all product enhancement ideas below. We welcome your feedback; your ideas will be reviewed by the Product Manager that oversees the development of that part of the product on an ongoing basis and updated with its current status monthly based on our product planning process. Ideas you submit could help us shape features currently in development or grow our repository of requirements for our next big enhancement. Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and expertise with us.
If you believe you are experiencing a defect please contact Support.
"Title" should not be required as a field in advocacy forms, especially for forms that target state legislators. California state legislators do not as a rule require (or even have) title on their web forms (e.g. https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD19).
This is suppressing participation and eliciting accusations of insensitivity to gender issues by our members. This should be a slam dunk.
Area of the Product | Advocacy |
Org/Company Name | California League of Conservation Voters |
Privacy Policy | Safe Harbor Notice | Terms of Use | Acceptable Use Policy | © 2019 Blackbaud, Inc. All Rights Reserved
ok, still looking at this issue? Needs to be dealt with.
Jason, thanks for the input. We are looking at ways to make the forms more dynamic based upon the end form requirements. Currently, in order to ensure deliverability across the board we have to require fields that are standards at both the federal and state levels.
Sara, thanks for your concern. I am referring to state legislators here in California. The link above, for example, links to a form in which the field is not required. Therefore, the field being required for forms that contact California state legislators -- in Sacramento, not Washington, D.C. -- harms Luminate users.
You do know that it isn't up to Luminate Online what is required, it's has to do with the members of Congress and other officials' forms, right?